Back to articles
Constitutional Law
JUSTICE BEYOND REACH: THE FINANCIAL BARRIERS TO ACCESSING JUSTICE IN NIGERIA
This article examines the critical gap between the legal right to justice and the financial reality of enforcing it in Nigeria. While the 1999 Constitution and the Legal Aid Act of 2011 establish frameworks to ensure legal redress and assistance, high litigation costs, filing fees, and professional representation remain prohibitive for low-income individuals. Furthermore, the Legal Aid Act’s restrictive eligibility threshold, primarily limited to those earning below the national minimum wage, leaves many vulnerable citizens without recourse. To bridge this gap, the article recommends reviewing the legal aid eligibility criteria to reflect current economic realities, increasing funding for legal aid, promoting pro bono and community legal initiatives, and simplifying court procedures to ensure justice in Nigeria is a universal right rather than a financial privilege.
Oziegbe Obehi Blessing
4 Nov 2026
4 min read
INTRODUCTION
The existence of legal rights does not necessarily mean that people can effectively enforce them. In Nigeria, a person may have a valid legal claim but lack the financial resources required to approach a court, engage legal representation, or sustain proceedings. This raises an important question: what is the value of a right that its holder cannot afford to enforce? Access to justice should not depend solely on a person's financial position. However, the cost of legal services and court processes continues to present a significant obstacle, particularly for low-income individuals. This article examines the legal framework for access to justice in Nigeria and the financial barriers that limit its practical realisation.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN NIGERIA
The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) recognises the importance of justice within the Nigerian legal system. Section 17(2)(e) provides that the independence, impartiality and integrity of courts of law shall be secured and maintained. More directly, section 46(1) permits a person who alleges that a fundamental right guaranteed under Chapter IV has been, is being or is likely to be contravened to apply to a High Court for redress. Section 46(4)(b) further requires the National Assembly to make provisions for financial assistance to indigent citizens seeking to enforce their fundamental rights, including assistance to engage the services of a legal practitioner to prosecute their claims. It also provides for rules securing legal aid for persons seeking to enforce their fundamental rights.¹ Similarly, the Legal Aid Act 2011 establishes a framework for providing legal assistance to persons who cannot adequately afford it. Section 8 provides for criminal defence, civil litigation and assistance in cases involving the breach or denial of rights and legal interests. It also recognises legal aid as including legal advice, assistance and representation. In addition, the Act provides for community legal services aimed at improving access to appropriate legal services.
FINANCIAL BARRIERS TO ACCESSING JUSTICE
Despite these legal provisions, the cost of pursuing justice remains a practical obstacle. Legal representation may require payment of professional fees, while litigation can involve filing fees, transportation, documentation and other procedural expenses. For individuals with limited or irregular income, these costs may make legal action difficult or entirely unaffordable. The financial burden is not limited to the commencement of proceedings; it may continue throughout the case. Consequently, some individuals may abandon legitimate claims, accept unfavourable settlements or refrain from seeking legal redress altogether. This creates a situation in which access to justice is influenced not only by the existence of a legal remedy but also by the financial capacity to pursue it. The problem also has a procedural dimension. In his examination of the enforcement of fundamental rights in Nigeria, Elijah Adewale Taiwo discusses how restrictive standing rules can impede access to courts. Although his analysis focuses on locus standi rather than litigation costs, it demonstrates that formal legal rights may remain difficult to enforce where barriers prevent individuals from approaching the courts.³
LIMITATIONS OF THE LEGAL AID FRAMEWORK
The Legal Aid Act represents an important intervention, but its eligibility requirements raise concerns about the extent of its reach. Section 10(1) provides that legal aid shall only be granted to a person whose income does not exceed the national minimum wage. Although section 10(2) permits the Board to grant assistance in exceptional circumstances to persons earning above that threshold, access to this discretion is not automatic.⁴ This requirement may leave some individuals without assistance. A person earning slightly above the national minimum wage may still be unable to meet the cost of legal representation, particularly where they have significant financial responsibilities. The existence of exceptional discretion and contributory legal aid under the Act does not remove the need to examine whether the eligibility framework adequately reflects the actual financial circumstances of applicants. Furthermore, the effectiveness of legal aid depends on adequate funding, public awareness and the practical availability of assistance. A statutory right to legal aid has limited value where eligible persons are unaware of the service or cannot readily obtain it.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
Improving access to justice requires more than the creation of legal rights. The eligibility threshold under the Legal Aid Act should be reviewed to reflect prevailing economic realities, while the exceptional and contributory arrangements should be made accessible and transparent. Government should also strengthen funding for legal aid services, improve public awareness, and support pro bono initiatives and university legal clinics. Efforts to simplify court procedures and reduce unnecessary financial burdens should equally be encouraged. Ultimately, justice should not be a privilege reserved for those who can afford it. Nigeria's constitutional and statutory framework provides a foundation for access to justice, but its promise can only be realised when financial circumstances do not prevent individuals from enforcing their lawful rights.
REFERENCES
1. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), ss 17(2)(e), 46(1) and 46(4)(b).
2. Legal Aid Act 2011, s 8.
3. Elijah Adewale Taiwo, ‘Enforcement of Fundamental Rights and the Standing Rules under the Nigerian Constitution: A Need for a More Liberal Provision’ (2009) 9 African Human Rights Law Journal 546.
4. Legal Aid Act 2011, s 10(1)–(2).
MORE READING